Pages

Saturday, November 17, 2007

Lacson vs Reyes GR No. 86250 February 26, 1990

Atty. Ephraim Serquina did not pay docket fees in his Motion for Attorney’s Fees, contending that such motion was only incidental to the probate of the will of Carmelita Farlin, he being the executor thereof. Thereafter, the heirs filed their answer and denied the claim for P68,000.00 attorney’s fees alleging that the sum agreed upon was only P7,000.00, a sum they had allegedly already paid.

The Supreme Court ruled that the court acquires jurisdiction over any case only upon payment of the prescribed docket fees. The payment of docket fees is required before the Motion for Attorney’s Fees could be validly tired.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

*nose bleed*

hehehe.,. i can't relate but i love ur blog.. it's neat :)

pareho kayo magsulat ng mama ko ah.. isa syang frustrated lawyer.. hehehe.. kasi di naka pasa sa bar.. pero nag graduate naman :) heehee..

^_^

Swexie said...

getting nose bleeds? lol! i'm using this blog for my case digest, anyway you can also read my other blogs...

http://khakiness.blogspot.com
http://yadayadaboo.blogspot.com
http://beyoutifull.blogspot.com
http://swimgear.blogspot.com

dami noh? hehehe...

Anonymous said...

hello.. salamat sa pagbisita:-)

mahina ako sa mga laws.. kaya sakit ng ulo ko last sem .. kasi may polsci...hehh.. kaya di ako medyo nakakarelate dito.. :-)

detour lang muna ako sa ibang blogs mo.. :-)