Pages

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Transportation Law Prelims

First of all, if you haven't read the digests, please feel free to browse them at the following links:

  • Dangwa Transportation

  • Japan Airlines V. Asuncion


  • I actually did not finish digesting all the required cases but if you're interested to browse other case digests in transportation law, please visit arellanolaw.net. You can find about 200 case digests concerning Transportation Law.

    Ok, let's begin.

    Contract of Transportation - a contract whereby a person obligates himself to transport persons or property from one place to another for a consideration. It may involve either the carriage of goods or carriage of passengers. The person who obligates to transport the goods or passengers may be a private carrier or common carrier.

    Perfection of the contract.
    There are actually two types of contract involved in here:
    1. Contract to carry - perfected by mere consent
    2. Contract of carriage (or of common carriage) - perfected once the passenger has already purchased a ticket and boarded the carrier (in case of airplanes and trains), attempted to board the conveyances (in cases of buses, jeepneys, taxi), or once the goods are unconditionally placed in the possession and control of the carrier
    What are common carriers?
    Common carriers are persons, corporations, firms or associations engaged in the business of carrying or transporting passengers or goods or both, by land, water, or air, for compensation, offering their services to the public. They are public utilities impressed with public interest and concern.

    Tests in determining whether a a party is a common carrier:
    1. He must be engaged and holds himself out as ready to engage in the business of carrying goods for others as a public employment;
    2. He must undertake to carry goods of the kind to which his business is confined;
    3. He must undertake to carry by the method by which his business is conducted and over his established roads;
    4. The transportation must be for hire.
    Characteristics of common carriers:
    1. carrying of persons or goods or both may be the principal business activity or merely an ancillary activity;
    2. transportation service may be offered on a regular, scheduled, occasional, episodic, or unscheduled basis;
    3. the services may be offered to the general public or only to a narrow segment of the general population;
    4. with or without a Certificate of Public Convenience;
    5. no distinction as to means of transporting, as long as it is by land, water or air;
    6. it does not only have to be transportation by motor vehicle;
    7. a common carrier may have no fixed or publicly known route, maintains no terminal, and doesn't issue tickets;
    8. a person or entity need not be engaged in the business of public transportation for the provisions of the Civil Code on common carriers to apply to them.
    Effect of Charter Party
    A charter party may transform a common carrier into a private carrier in case of a bareboat or demise charter where the charterer mans the vessel with its own people and becomes, in effect, the owner for the voyage or service stipulated.


    Towage - where one vessel is hired to bring another vessel to another place
    Arrastre - receive, handle, care for and deliver merchandise passing through ports
    Stevedoring - loading and unloading of coastwise vessels calling at the port

    GOVERNING LAWS (sus, kung si Manriquez pa atong professor sigurado ko mugawas jud ni!)
    1. Code of Commerce and other special laws
    2. Law of the country of destination applies
    3. Warsaw Convention (Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to the International Carriage by Air
    Summary of Rules:
    1. Coastwise Shipping
      • New Civil Code (Art. 1732-1766) - primary law
      • Code of commerce - suppletorily
    2. Carriage from Foreign Ports to Philippine Ports
      • New Civil Code - primary law
      • Code of Commerce - all matters not regulated bu the Civil Code
      • Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA) - suppletorily to the Civil Code
    3. Carriage from Philippine Ports to Foreign Ports
      • The laws of the country to which the goods are to be transported
    4. Overland Transport
      • Civil Code - primary
      • Code of Commerce - suppletorily
    5. Air Transportation
      • Civil Code
      • Code of Commerce
      • For International Carriage - COGSA, as amended
    I AM SICK! DI NAKO MAG-UPDATE.. TULOG SAKO! 12/21/07

    Wednesday, December 19, 2007

    Credit Transactions Prelims

    Exam Coverage
    -Loans
    -Deposit
    -Warehouse Receipts

    LOANS
    Two kinds of loan:
    1. Commodatum – where one person called the bailor (lender) delivers to another called the baille (borrower) a non-consumable thing so that the latter may use it for a certain time and return the identical thing.
    2. Mutuum – where the lender delivers to the borrower money or other consumable thing upon the condition that the latter shall pay the same amount of the same kind and quality.

    Distinctions of commodatum and mutuum:
    1. Commodatum ordinarily involves something not consumable, while in mutuum, the subject matter is money or other consumable thing;
    2. In commodatum, ownership of the thing loaned is retained by the lender, while in mutuum, the ownership is transferred to the borrower;
    3. Commodatum is essentially gratuitous, while mutuum may be gratuitous or may be onerous, that is, with stipulation to pay interest;
    4. In commodatum, the borrower must return the same thing loaned, while in mutuum, the borrower need only pay the same amount of the same kind and quality;
    5. Commodatum may involve real or personal property, while mutuum refers only to personal property;
    6. Commodatum is a loan for use or temporary possession, while mutuum is a loan for consumption;
    7. In commodatum, the bailor may demand the return of the thing loaned before the expiration of the term in case of urgent need, while in mutuum, the lender may not demand the return of the thing before the lapse of the term agreed upon;
    8. In commodatum, the loss of the thing loaned is suffered by the bailor since he is the owner, while in mutuum, the borrower suffers the loss even if it is caused by a fortuitous event and he is not therefore discharged from his duty to pay;
    9. Commodatum is purely personal in character, while mutuum is not so.
    Kinds of Commodatum
    1. Ordinary commodatum – (as defined above)
    2. Precarium – where the bailor may demand the thing loaned at will

    Characteristics of commodatum:
    1. Real – delivery is necessary for the perfection of the contract.
    2. Unilateral – once the subject matter has already been delivered, it creates on the part of the borrower the obligation to return the identical thing

    Commodatum notes-

    1. Similar to donation in that in confers a benefit to the recipient
    2. The borrower may not use the fruits of the thing loaned, unless there is a stipulation to the contrary.
    3. The bailor need not be the owner of the thing loaned since by loan, ownership does not pass to the borrower.
    4. The death of either the bailor or the bailee extinguishes the commodatum, being a contract which is purely personal in character.
    5. The borrower may not lend the thing loaned to a third person. However, it may extend to the members of his household, unless there is a stipulation to the contrary or unless the nature of the thing forbids such use.

    Obligations of the Bailee

    1. To pay for the ordinary expenses for the use and preservation of the thing loaned.
    2. To pay for the loss of the thing even if it is caused by fortuitous event in the following cases:
      • If he devotes the thing to any purpose other than that intended (he acts in bad faith)
      • If he retains the thing beyond the agreed term or after the accomplishment of its use (he incurs delay)
      • If the thing loan was delivered with an appraisal of its value, unless there is a stipulation exempting the bailee from liability in case of fortuitous event (presumed by law)
      • If he lends or leases the thing to third persons (commodatum is purely personal)
      • If, being able to save the thing borrowed or his own thing, he chooses to save the latter (ingratitude).
    3. To return the thing loaned. The bailee may only retain the thing IF he suffered losses or damages because of the flaws of the thing loaned.
    4. To be solidarity liable in case there are two or more bailees.

    Obligations of the Bailor
    1. To respect the duration of the loan, unless he should have urgent need of the thing.
    2. To refund the extraordinary expenses.
    3. To pay the damages caused by known hidden flaws. Requisites:
      • There is a flaw or defect in the thing loaned;
      • The flaw or defect is hidden
      • The bailor is aware thereof
      • He does not advise th bailee of the same; and
      • The bailee suffers damages by reason the the said flaw or defect
    Mutuum, notes-
    1. The borrower acquires ownership of the thing loaned.
    2. The relationship of the parties is that of obligor-obligee.
    3. Muttum involves money or any other fungible things.
    4. It may be gratuitous.
    5. No interest shall be due unless it has been expressly stipulated in writing. In case the payment of interest is agreed and in writing, but the interest rate is not indicated, the legal interest rate of 12% shall apply. Exceptions to the rule when interest may be due even in the absence of stipulation:
      • Indemnity for damages due to delay
      • Interest accruing from unpaid interest - when judicially demanded or stipulated (presupposes a stipulated interest, the interest contemplated in this exception is the interest of the defaulted interest payments)
    DEPOSITS
    A deposit is constituted from the moment a person receives a thing belonging to another with the obligation of safly keeping it and of retuning the same.

    Characteristics of deposit:
    1. Real - delivery is necessary for the perfection of the contract
    2. Unilateral (when gratuitous) - only the depositary has the obligation of safely keeping the thing deposited
    3. Bilateral (when onerous) - the depositary has the obligation of safely keeping the thing deposited and the depositor has the obligation therefor to pay the fees associated with the deposit.
    Distinctions between deposit and mutuum
    1. In deposit, the principal purpose is the safekeeping or mere custody, while in mutuum, the consumption of the subject matter;
    2. In deposit, the depositor can demand the return of the subject matter at will, while in mutuum, th lender must wait until the expiration of the period granted to the debtor;
    3. In deposit, both movable and immovable property may be the object, while in mutuum, only money and other fungible thing.
    Disctinctions between deposit and commodatum
    1. In deposit, the principal purpose is the safekeeping or mere custody, while in commodatum, the transfer of the use;
    2. Deposit may be gratuitous or onerous, while commodatum is essentially and always gratuitous;
    3. In extrajudicial deposit, only movable things may be the object, while in commodatum, both movable and immovable property may be the object.
    Kinds of deposit
    1. Judicial - one which takes place when an attachment or seizure of property in litigation is ordered; it may involve movable or immovable property
    2. Extrajudicial - which may be further classified into:
      • Voluntary - one wherein the delivery is made by the will of the depositor/s
      • Necessary - one made in compliance with a legal obligation, or on th occasion of a calamity, or by travelers in hotels and inns or with common carriers.
    Deposit, notes-
    1. A deposit is a gratuitous contract, except
      • when there is contrary stipulation
      • where the depositary is engaged in the business of storing goods
      • where the property is saved from the destruction without knowledge of the owner - negotiorum gestio applies
    2. Deposit only contemplates corporeal things
    3. Interpleader is an action to compel the depositors to settle their conflicting claims among themselves.
    4. A contract of deposit may be entered into orally or in writing.
    5. When the deposit is made by an incapacitated person to a depositary who is a capacitated person, the latter incurs all the obligations of a depositary and must return the property to the legal representative of the incapacitated or to the depositor himself if he should acquire capacity.
    6. When the deposit is made by a capacitated person to a depositary who is incapacitated, the latter does not incur all the obligations of a depositary but he must return the thing deposited while it is still in his possession, and to pay the depositor the amount by which he may have benefited himself with the thing or its price subject to the right of any third person who acquired the thing in good faith.
    7. Permission is not presumed. The burden of proof is on the depositary to prove that permission has been given.
    8. Fault on the part of the depositary is presumed, unless there is proof to the contrary.
    9. The depositary cannot demand that the depositor prove the ownership of the thing. But, if he discovers that the thing deposited has been stolen, the depositary has the duty to inform the true owner of such fact.
    Obligations of the Depositary
    1. To keep the thing deposited and return it.
    2. Not to transfer the deposit, unless there is stipulation to the contrary.
    3. Not to change the way of deposit, unless consented by the depositor.
    4. To collect interest on choses in action deposited.
    5. Not to co-mingle things if such is stipulated.
    6. Not to make use of the things deposited unless authorized.
    7. Liability for th loss of the thing through a fortuitous event if:
      • it is so stipulated
      • if he uses the thing without permission
      • if he incurs delay in returning the thing
      • if he allows other persons to use the thing deposited
    8. Return the thing deposited when delivered closed and sealed, in the same condition.
    9. Pay for damages should the seal or lock be broken through his fault.
    10. Keep the secret of the deposit when the seal or lock is broken, with or without his fault.
    11. Return the deposit with its products, accessions, and accessories.
    12. Pay interest on sums converted for personal use.
    Irregular deposit distinguished from mutuum
    1. In an irregular deposit, the consumable thing deposited may be demanded at will by the irregular depositor, while in mutuum, the lender is bound to respect the time agreed upon by the parties.
    2. In an irregular deposit, the only benefit is that which accrues to the depositor, while in mutuum, the essential cause for the transaction is the necessity of the borrower.
    3. The depositor in an irregular deposit has preference over other creditors with respect to the thing deposited, while common creditors enjoy no preference in the distribution of the debtor's property.
    i am tired of reading deposits... let's jump to....

    WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS
    A warehouse receipt is a written acknowledgment by a warehouseman that he has received and holds certain goods therein described in store for the person to whom it is issued. It is also the simple written contract between the owner of the goods and the warehouseman to pay the compensation for that service.

    Contents of the warehouse receipt:
    1. Location of the warehouse
    2. Date of issue of receipt
    3. Consecutive number of receipt
    4. Person to whom goods are deliverable
    5. Rate of storage charges
    6. Description of goods or packages
    7. Signature of warehouseman
    8. Warehouseman's ownership of or interest in goods
    9. Statement of advances made and liabilities incurred.
    Obligations of the warehouseman:
    1. to take good care of the goods entrusted to his safekeeping
    2. to deliver them to the holder of the receipt or the depositor provided the following conditions are complied:
      • demand was made, accompanied by:
      • an offer to satisfy the warehouseman's lien
      • an offer to surrender the receipt
      • a readiness and willingness to sign the receipt
    Person to whom goods must be delivered:
    1. person lawfully entitled to possession of goods or his agent
    2. person entitled to delivery under a non-negotiable receipt or with written authority
    3. person in possession of a non-negotiable receipt
    Acts for which warehouseman is liable:
    1. Failure to stamp "duplicate" on copies of a negotiable receipt
      • the warehouseman shall be liable for all damages caused to any one who purchased the subsequent receipt for value
    2. Failure to place "non-negotiable" or "not-negotiable" on a non-negotiable receipt
      • the warehouse receipt shall be considered negotiable provided the holder of such unmarked receipt purchased it for value supposing it to be negotiable
    3. Misdelivery of the goods
      • the warehouseman has a liability similar to a bank paying a forged check and also a liability as for conversion (whatever that means?)
    4. Failure to effect cancellation of a negotiable receipt upon delivery of the goods
      • the warehouseman shall be liable to anyone who purchases for value in good faith such receipt which have not been cancelled, after such purchaser acquired title to the receipt
    5. Issuing receipt for non-existing goods or misdescribed goods
      • warehouseman shall be liable for damages
    6. Failure to take care of the goods
      • the warehouseman in liable for any loss or injury to the goods caused by his failure to exercise ordinary or reasonable care in the custody of the goods
    7. Failure to give notice in case of sale of goods to satisfy his lien or because goods are perishable or hazardous.
      • the warehouseman shall be severally liable to each depositor for the care and redelivery of his share of such mass to the same extent and under the same circumstances as if the goods had been kept separate.
    NO MORE UPDATES FOR TODAY... (--, ) 12/20/2007

    Take a break

    I found this video on youtube, you might find it interesting... Can you relate?



    I know law students all over the world can relate to this

    Monday, December 10, 2007

    Administrative Law Prelims

    ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.

    As defined by Goodnow, Administrative Law is that branch of public law which deals with three things:

    1. fixes the organization of the government;
    2. determines the competence of administrative authorities;
    3. indicates to the individuals remedies for the violation of their rights.

    Administrative law covers all the portion of the public law of the land concerning executive and administrative officials. It deals with the enforcement and execution of the laws of the State, its powers and duties, the law on public officers, their election, appointment, and removal, their rights, duties, and liabilities. It also covers the law of public corporations, the laws that provide for the grant of rights, privileges, bounties of government to private individuals.

    The following are the sources of administrative law:

    1. Statute of legislation – these are the laws passed by congress;
    2. Decisions/Interpretations made by the courts – Jurisprudence or court decisions involving administrative law and procedures
    3. Rules and regulations made by the administrative agency or body charged of implementing the law – these are what we call the Implementing Rules and Regulation of laws passed by congress. Administrative bodies have this quasi-legislative power in making the rules and regulations for statutes.
    4. Decisions/Interpretations made by the administrative body/agency tasked to implement the law – Aside from the quasi-legislative power, administrative agencies/bodies also have quasi-judicial power which shall be later on discussed.


    What is the purpose of administrative law?

    The chief concern of administrative law is the protection of private rights. Its subject matter is the nature and mode of exercise of administrative power and the system of relief against administrative action.


    What is the function of administrative law?

    Its function is to make the government machinery work well in an orderly manner. It is the body of rules that makes every component part of the government perform its assigned tasks.

    ADMINISTRATIVE BODY

    An administrative body is a body composed of one or more officials designed to carry on certain business of government, to dispense certain services or privileges accorded by government, to regulate certain public callings, to promote the general welfare through police regulations, to determine rights of individuals in certain cases where a strong social policy is involved, to use a varying degree of discretion in arriving at decision and, often to proceed without being bound by some of the so-called technical procedures of law courts.

    Types of administrative bodies:

    Those set-up to function when the government is ---

    1. offering some gratuity grant or social privilege (such as Phil. Veterans Administration)

    2. seeking to carry on certain business of the government (such as BIR, Bureau of Customs)

    3. seeking to regulate business affected with public interest (such as Land Transportation Commission)

    4. exercising police power to regulate private businesses and individuals (such as Securities and Exchange Commission)

    5. adjusting individual controversies because of some strong social policy involved (such as National Labor Relations Commission, Court of Agrarian Relations)

    6. setting up of bodies where the government becomes a private party (such as Commission on Audit and GSIS)

    Powers of administrative bodies

    The powers of administrative bodies may be classified into:

    1. Ministerial Powers – this refers to the administrative body’s power to perform a given state of facts, in a prescribed manner, in obedience to the mandate of a legal authority without regard to the exercise of his own judgment. (Example, Register of Deeds with respect to the registration of properties)

    2. Discretionary Powers – this refers to the administrative body’s authority to do any act, the doing of the same being dependent upon his sound discretion (Example, the Commission on Audit, an auditor exercises his discretion in the performance of his duties)

    3. Determinative Powers – further classified into:

    a. Directing power – refers to corrective powers, power of assessment, abstract determination such as definition, valuation, classification, and fact-finding (Example, power of assessment of BIR)

    b. Dispensing power – consists of the granting of exemptions from or relaxing of a general prohibition (Example, authority of the zoning boards to vary the provision of zoning statute or ordinance)

    c. Enabling power- the power to approve something which the law undertakes to regulate; manifested in the granting or denial of licenses to engage in a particular business or occupation (Example, LTFRB, Board of Censors, Central Bank)

    d. Examining power – also called the investigatory power, which consists in requiring the production of books, papers, records for inspection, the attendance of witnesses and compelling their testimony and the filing of statements (Example, Commission on Elections)

    e. Summary power – the power to apply compulsion or force against a person or property to effectuate a legal purpose without a judicial warrant to authorize such action

    4. Quasi-legislative Power (rule-making power) – the power of making rules and regulations to govern a certain subject within its jurisdiction. This grant of rule-making power is a relaxation of the principle of separation of power and serves an as exception to the non-delegation of legislative power. Administrative relations adopted under legislative authority by particular department must be in harmony with the provisions of the law, and should be for the sole purpose of carrying into effect its general provisions, without extending, expanding, or amending the law itself.

    a. Requisites for the validity of administrative rules and regulations:

    i. It must have been issued under the authority of law

    ii. It must be within the scope and purview of the law

    iii. It must be reasonable

    iv. Must be published in the official gazette and newspaper of general circulation

    v. Must be registered with the UP Law Center

    b. Exceptions:

    i. Those which are merely internal in nature regulating personnel of the agency and not the public

    ii. Letters of instructions issued by an administrative superior to be followed by subordinates

    c. Categories of rules and regulations that may be promulgated:

    i. Those intended to supply the details of a legislation

    ii. Those that are intended to construe or interpret the particular law or statute being enforced

    iii. Those that are intended to determine some facts or state of things from which the enforcement of the law shall depend

    5. Quasi-Judicial Power (power of adjudication) – the power to investigate facts, hold hearings, and draw conclusions from them as a basis for their official action and to exercise discretion of a judicial nature. Quasi-judicial adjudication is a determination of rights, privileges, and duties resulting in a decision or order which applies to a situation. (Example, the National Labor Relations Commission adjudicates labor cases)

    a. Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction – means that the judicial action of a case is deferred pending the determination of some issues which properly belong to an administrative body because their expertise, specialized skills, knowledge and resources as required for the resolution of the factual or non-legal matters. This requires substantial evidence, or such evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion, the quality of evidence necessary for a court to affirm a decision of an administrative body.

    b. Trial-type hearing or a full blown hearing is needed when adjudicative fact is to be established.

    c. Types of administrative investigation

    i. Determinative – the purpose is to determine the facts which would qualify the positive application of the law being enforced, administered, or implemented

    ii. Disciplinary administrative investigation

    EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

    Where the law provides for the remedies against the action of an administrative board, body or officer, relief to courts against such action can be sought only after exhausting all the remedies provided for. As a general rule, the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies applies only when there is an express legal provision requiring such administrative step as a condition precedent to the taking of an action in court.

    Exceptions to exhaustion of administrative remedies:

    1. When no administrative review is provided by law
    2. When the issue is purely legal
    3. When the party invoking the doctrine is guilty of estoppel
    4. When there is unreasonable delay of official action that will prejudice the complaint
    5. When the amount involved is too small as to make the rule impractical and oppressive to the complainant
    6. When there is no plain, adequate, and speedy remedy available
    7. When there is “qualified political agency”
    8. In land case, when the land in question is a private land
    9. When it will result into the nullification of the claim or cause of action
    10. When there is an official action demanded by public interest