Pages

Monday, December 03, 2012

December 12 is International Day Against Trafficking


Above is a snapshot I took from the Hall of Justice today. It's good to know that the forum we conducted in several public schools are in time for the commemoration of the International Day Against Human Trafficking this coming December 12, 2012.

Let me share with you some slides from my presentation concerning the Anti-Trafficking Law:

What do you mean by TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS?



What are the ACTS OF TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS?




How can we PROSECUTE TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS?

Monday, November 26, 2012

Forum on Sexual Harassment, Rape, Trafficking in Persons, and Violence Against Women and their Children

The Luna Legal Resources for Women and Children, Inc., in cooperation with the Integrated Gender Development Division of the City of Davao and JCI Duwaling, Inc. has been conducting a series of fora on sexual harassment, rape, trafficking in persons, and violence against women and their children.

The fora were held at the different public schools all over Davao City with the following schedules:


November 20, 2012 – Wangan National High School, Calinan, Davao City; 1:00 – 4:30 PM
November 21, 2012 – Bernardo Carpio National High School, Buhangin, Davao City; 1:00 – 4:30 PM
November 22, 2012 – Cabantian National High School, Cabantian, Davao City; 1:00 – 4:30 PM
November 23, 2012 – Ramos National High School, Lanang, Davao City; 1:00 – 4:30 PM
November 27, 2012 – Doña Carmen National High School, Toril, Davao City; 1:00 – 4:30 PM
November 28, 2012 – Piedad National High School, Toril, Davao City; 1:00 – 4:30 PM


Fifty (50) student-leaders, from the mentioned schools were pre-selected to join the forum. Members of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines - Davao City Chapter were invited to conduct the said forum, among them are: Atty. Suzette Balucanag; Atty. Adolf Ryan Lantion; Atty. Chilette Escovilla; and Atty. Elisa Lapiña, all of whom are products of the University of Mindanao College of Law.

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Review Notes: Contracts

Here are some of my notes taken down during my bar review. These notes are not meant to replace reading your textbooks but will only be a supplement to your readings. Nothing beats reading the codal provisions, text books, and jurisprudence.

These notes focus on Article 1306, the liberty of contracts as well as the principle of mutuality.

Unconscionable interest rates may be declared void for being contrary to morals.

In Union Growers Inc. case: Circular No. 905 of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas allows contracting parties to stipulate the rates of interest.

There is no absolute liberty. Stipulations must not be contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order, or public policy.

In relation to Article 2035, what may not be compromised:

  1. civil status of persons
  2. validity of a marriage or legal separation
  3. ground for legal separation
  4. future support
  5. the jurisdiction of course
  6. future legitime
Non-involvement clause could be declared void depending on the circumstances. If the non-involvement clause is all-encompassing as to constitute restraint of trade, it is contrary to public policy.

Mutuality of contracts (Article 1308). Parties may agree to waive certain rights as long as the waiver is not contrary to law, morals, public policy, etc.

Article 1347 in relation to Article 905 on Future Inheritance: No contract may be entered into upon future inheritance except in cases expressly authorized by law.

GSIS Case. Facts: construction of house; bad bargain; asking for additional payment because of increase in the cost of construction materials but the contract did not provide an escalation clause. SC: contractor is not entitled to additional payment.

Security Bank Case. Facts: construction of building and contract provided for an escalation clause. SC: parties are bound by the principle of mutuality of contracts. Security Bank must PAY.

Article 311 Relativity of Contracts = binding effect of contracts.

What is stipulation pour autrui? A stipulation in favor of third persons, not parties to the instrument.

How are contracts perfected? Give examples of each of them. (Article 1315 and 1316)
Contracts are perfected depending upon their nature. Consensual contracts are perfected by mere consent, such as contract of sale. Real contracts, such as commodatum, are perfected until the delivery of the object of the obligation. 

Naguiat vs CA. Payment of a check is not equivalent to delivery. Contract of mutuum is not perfected until the proceeds of the check have been encashed. It only constitutes consensual agreement to lend money at a future time.

When is there consent? When there is meeting of the minds as to the object and cause or consideration.

Consent may be proven by evidence aliunde.

Object must be definite, determinate, and within the commerce of man.

Cause or consideration is presumed (Article 1354)

Article 1354 in relation to Article 1479 (Options): Is the consideration distinct from the price? Is it always in the form of money?

Answer: Read Serra vs. Court of Appeals and RCBC of Sorsogon. The stipulation whereby the building shall be transferred to the lessor int he case the lessee does not exercise the option to buy is the consideration of the option. Therefore, a consideration may be an undertaking, distinct from the price.

In Sanchez vs Rigos, no money, undertaking, or anything of value was given, the offer was simply accepted. The offer may be withdraw anytime prior to the exercise of the option because there's no consideration distinct from the price.



That's it for now. I suggest you read the full text of the jurisprudence mentioned.

Tuesday, November 06, 2012

Safety Issues: What's in my medicine? (Propyphenazone and Phenylpropanolamine)

Today, I bought Saridon from Mercury Drug at P 4.50 per tablet. I asked if there are any other medicines with Propyphenazone but the pharmacists could not give me any. Saridon is a drug available in the Philippines over-the-counter. When you say over-the-counter, it means that pharmacies can dispense the drug without the need of doctor's prescription.



An article in Sunstar Cebu has questioned the safety of Saridon, and more specifically, the safety of one of its main ingredients, Propyphenazone. The issue presented on the mentioned article boils down on how Prophyphenazone is banned in some countries while it is allowed in the Philippines with seemingly low to no dispensing restrictions, and on how medicines should be restricted on specific cases.

Saridon is not the only drug in the Philippines with Propyphenazone. Propyphenazone is mainly used to relieve pain and fever and is made a component of drugs due to its fast onset of action. With Propyphenazone, a drug takes effect in as little as 15 minutes. According to The Filipino Doctor, Propyphenazone acts quickly but also loses its effect quickly, so it complements Paracetamol, which takes effect slowly but has a longer lasting effect.

Propyphenazone, along with most if not all drugs, has contraindications, side effects and adverse drug reactions. They drug's dosage, which was listed by Mims Drug Information System at .5 to upto 1g up to 4 times daily for adults could readily tell us that the the amount of Propyhenazone in Saridon (which is only 150 mg per tablet) is way lower than the recommended dosage. Personally, I believe that the content of Propyhenazone in Saridon does not pose serious risk unless of course if the drug is taken in large doses for long periods of time, or if the drug is taken by people who are not supposed to take it like pregnant women and children.

The banning of Propyphenazone in some countries creates a lot of stir and would make us question why these medicines are not restricted for Filipino consumption.

On the other hand, Phenylpropanolamine is strictly regulated in the United States, was withdrawn in the Canadian Market, and banned in India. In 2010, the USA Food and Drugs Administration took steps to remove Phenylpropanolamine-containing medicines in the market, which then moved drug companies in reformulating these medicines. Phenylpropanolamine is an ingredient of Sinutab Extra Strength, which is also available in our country as an over-the-counter medicine.

With all these information placing us in a limbo, I can't help but question if there is a specific person or office which should clear these issues, and some more issues on medicines which have not even been brought up online. In my conversation with a certain doctor, I was told that the regulation of drugs is generally the function of ourFood and Drugs Administration (formerly Bureau of Food and Drugs or BFAD). Being the the guiding authority in this matter, it is only proper that our government agency should take the necessary measure in regulating drugs and ensuring that proper information about drug and medicine use would reach our kababayans. Our FDA is even mandated to monitor product advertisements and promotions to ensure that they comply with the existing laws.

We Filipinos are so fond of self-medicating. We don't go to doctors specially in the simple case of cough and colds and we would directly go to the nearest botika to buy what's available to relieve us of our ailments. In light of all the issues surrounding the laxity in dispensing our drugs, we must always take caution in buying and taking medicines.

Second Semester of Law School Begins

How's your first semester? I hope that law school has been treating you right. Most students have received or seen their first sem grades by now. I'm pretty sure that getting even just a passing grade of 75% would make a law student jump for joy.

What if I failed on a subject in law school?

Failing is not the end of the world. So you flunked, you can take the subject again. But if you flunked more than one subject in one semester, I think it would be best to ask yourself first whether or not you're still interested in the course. Studying law is not a walk in the part and you have to remember that this is not just law school, it's also an investment. Every law student should instill in his brain that going to school for 3 hours (or more) everyday to attend the classes is unlike going to your elementary or high school classes. Remember that you enrolled in law school because you want to become a lawyer. You might have other reasons for enrolling but bear in mind that it's pointless to study law if you don't have that ultimate goal of becoming an A-T-T-Y.

Set your priorities right. You might say that it's good to study with a group of friends, one we commonly call as group studying. But is it really productive? Some people love to study in groups because it helps them cope with boredom. Sure, you can chat with your pals when you're fed up with your books, but do you monitor the amount of time you spend talking with your friends compared to the amount of time you spend on reading? Personally, group study is not as efficient as having your one-on-one time with your books. It's boring, right, but the assimilation of lessons are best done when you're not dividing your attention and focus between books and the latest gossip. Also, there is absolutely no group work in the bar examinations. Keep your friends close, they will help you preserve your sanity. But keep them at a distance during the time of study.

Make up your mind. If you're into law school because you're pressured to do it, then evaluate your self and think about what you really want. It wouldn't help you a single bit if you're not happy with what you do. Imagine yourself 5 or 10 years from now. If you think that being in law school will help you or will make you the person that you want to become in the future, then continue your studies. If it's otherwise, then I think it's better to stop that spend 4 years of wasting your life in a road that you don't even want to walk through.

Good luck on second sem!

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

October 2012 Bar Examination

The mechanics for the October 2012 Bar Examinations have been changed and for the first time, barristers will be subjected to both Multiple Choice and Essay questions per subject.

I've heard some complaints after the first Sunday, mostly about how lengthy the examinations were and the lack of time to finish the two sets of questions. There were 100 multiple choice questions per subject. There were 10 sets of essay questions with at least 2 sub-questions for each set. I wonder if I'd be able to finish all of those in 4 hours.

Barristers were allowed to take home their questionnaires for this year's bar examination. I think that it would be a bad idea to read those questions again. I'd say, just throw it away. Anyway, you can download the questionnaires later from the Supreme Court website.

Questionnaires from the first three Sundays are already posted at the SC website.

Monday, September 10, 2012

Medicines, Disclaimer, and the Social Media

The dynamics of medicine promotion have changed over the past years. Advertisements may be circulated through any form of mass medium, which, in the traditional sense, is limited to print, radio, and television. Nowadays, advertisements have invaded the internet platform, and has infiltrated social media. Here are my views and opinions about pharmaceutical brands' online campaigns.

Medicine Advertisements in Traditional Media
Way back in 2009, my professor in Medico Legal gave us an assignment to evaluate the current advertisements of medicines (including alternative medicines) in print, radio, and television. Dr. B has stressed the use of the phrase "No Approved Therapeutic Claim" as a disclaimer on alternative medicines which have been gaining popularity and were increasing in number. Our task is to inform the publisher or broadcasting networks whether or not the advertisements being played or printed comply with The Consumer Act of the Philippines (RA 7394).

The results of our evaluation showed that some of the companies, specifically those promoting herbal or traditional drugs have failed to comply in including the disclaimer in their advertisements. We finished our assignments by writing the concerned publishers and broadcasting networks about our observation. Unfortunately, we did not follow up whether the concerned parties took some action to rectify their ads.

After a little less than one year, the Department of Health, in an attempt to protect the general public from any misleading information, has disallowed the use of the phrase "No Approved Therapeutic Claim" and instead strictly enforced the standard message which states, "MAHALAGANG PAALALA: ANG (name of product) AY HINDI GAMOT AT HINDI DAPAT GAMITING PANGGAMOT SA ANUMANG URI NG SAKIT."

As if to say that the generic disclaimer is lacking, DOH now wants to get the message across and has even translated it to Filipino, which, admittedly, has a stronger impact than the original almost-meaningless disclaimer. However, I have yet to see any supplement containing the caveat.

What's wrong with our advertisements?
A friend from Germany told me once how dangerous our medicine advertisements are. Our television ads focus much on the endorser's smile, body, or how a certain drug has been such a miraculous healer. Our medicine ads focus much on the drug's safety, reliability, affordability. However, our medicine ads are too lenient and too skimpy on the information about the particular drug.

Let me give you a simple comparison between magazine advertisements published in our country and those published outside.

Taken from Ladies' Home Journal, April 2011 issue, pages 78 to 80:

Three pages of a medicine advertisement with separate "Important Patient Information" section is a common form of drug ads in foreign magazines.

Taken from Good Housekeeping (USA), November 2010 issue, pages 20-21:

In this advertisement, possible side effects and other important safety information about the product are provided. A consumer brief summary is also printed on the following pages (22-24, not in photo).

 Drug advertisements both printed in the Cosmopolitan (Philippines) December 2008 issue:
Just plain advertisement, no drug information is available.

Everybody would definitely say that the baby is cute. But that's beside the point.
A simple internet research would lead you to a website stating the possible side effects of Calpol.
This drug advertisement does not mention of any.

The power of the internet has been utilized by almost everybody, including pharmaceutical companies. Medicine advertisements have also invaded the social media, apart from the staple tv, radio, and print ads. Social Media advertising is present in blogs, Facebook, and recently, there have been giveaways and contests where participants are encouraged to disseminate medicine advertisements through their facebook and twitter accounts.

Now, if the pharmaceutical companies cannot provide us with the proper information about their drugs in print ads, how can they now give us these basic information through social media advertising? 

Advertisers are building communities through social media, but honestly, I am more loyal to a certain type of brand because of how it works and not because I'm one of their Facebook Page fans. I may like a certain page because of their promos, but I don't necessarily patronize their products more because of it.

Consumers need basic information about drugs and medicines and we must demand  these from pharmaceutical companies. Their presence in social media must be balanced by being transparent through the availability of information about their products.

The use of violence in commercials
Honestly, I rarely watch television. And when I do, I skip from one channel to another when it's advertisement time. I've only noticed some medicine commercials, particularly that of Saridon, through the Youtube videos, and can't help but notice the harshness of how the product was presented. Can you imagine nails being driven at your head?!




Saridon's commercials attempt to be funny, and it's not too far from the Vic Sotto movies where the latter would make "funny but definitely hurtful gestures" to his sidekick. Saridon's commercial might be apparently violent, but it's not too far from Solmux' commercial where Aga Muhlach suggested that a child's back be slammed by a gorilla to get the phlegm out. The latter may not be too harsh, but the suggestion of violence is still present. To refresh your memory about the gorilla scene, here's a youtube video of it:



I frown at the use of violence in commercials. But as someone who is not really very fond of television, and someone who has actually planned on limiting my future kids' television exposure, I think that it is already the responsibility of parents and elders to teach their kids, regulate what to watch and guide them on how to react to what they see. As with Saridon's commercial, I find myself neutral.


Wednesday, August 08, 2012

RULE ON DECLARATION OF ABSOLUTE NULLITY OF VOID MARRIAGES AND ANNULMENT OF VOIDABLE MARRIAGES

This might not be very new but most lawyers do not know that there's an updated rule on declaration of absolute nullity of marriage. Just a few months ago, I received a Motion to Declare Respondent (in an annulment case) in Default.


Section 1. Scope.– This Rule shall govern petitions for declaration of absolute nullity of void marriages and annulment of voidable marriages under the Family Code of the Philippines.

The Rules of Court shall apply suppletorily.

Sec. 2. Petition for declaration of absolute nullity of void marriages.– 

(a) Who may file.–A petition for declaration of absolute nullity of void marriage may be filed solely by the husband or the wife. (n)

(b) Where to file.–The petition shall be filed in the Family Court.

(c) Imprescriptibility of action or defense.–An action or defense for the declaration of absolute nullity of void marriage shall not prescribe.

(d) What to allege.–A petition under Article 36 of the Family Code shall specifically allege the complete facts showing that either or both parties were psychologically incapacitated from complying with the essential marital obligations of marriage at the time of the celebration of marriage even if such incapacity becomes manifest only after its celebration.

The complete facts should allege the physical manifestations, if any, as are indicative of psychological incapacity at the time of the celebration of the marriage but expert opinion need not be alleged.

Sec. 3. Petition for annulment of voidable marriages.– 

(a) Who may file.–The following persons may file a petition for annulment of voidable marriage based on any of the grounds under Article 45 of the Family Code and within the period herein indicated:

  1. The contracting party whose parent, or guardian, or person exercising substitute parental authority did not give his or her consent, within five years after attaining the age of twenty-one unless, after attaining the age of twenty-one, such party freely cohabitated with the other as husband or wife; or the parent, guardian or person having legal charge of the contracting party, at any time before such party has reached the age of twenty-one;

  2. The sane spouse who had no knowledge of the other’s insanity; or by any relative, guardian, or person having legal charge of the insane, at any time before the death of either party; or by the insane spouse during a lucid interval or after regaining sanity, provided that the petitioner, after coming to reason, has not freely cohabited with the other as husband or wife;

  3. The injured party whose consent was obtained by fraud, within five years after the discovery of the fraud, provided that said party, with full knowledge of the facts constituting the fraud, has not freely cohabited with the other as husband or wife;

  4. The injured party whose consent was obtained by force, intimidation, or undue influence, within five years from the time the force, intimidation, or undue influence disappeared or ceased, provided that the force, intimidation, or undue influence having disappeared or ceased, said party has not thereafter freely cohabited with the other as husband or wife;

  5. The injured party where the other spouse is physically incapable of consummating the marriage with the other and such incapacity continues and appears to be incurable, within five years after the celebration of marriage; and

  6. The injured party where the other party was afflicted with a sexually-transmissible disease found to be serious and appears to be incurable, within five years after the celebration of marriage.


(b) Where to file.–The petition shall be filed in the Family Court.

Sec. 4. Venue.–The petition shall be filed in the Family Court of the province or city where the petitioner or the respondent has been residing for at least six months prior to the date of filing, or in the case of a non-resident respondent, where he may be found in the Philippines, at the election of the petitioner.

Sec. 5. Contents and form of petition.–(1) The petition shall allege the complete facts constituting the cause of action.

(2) It shall state the names and ages of the common children of the parties and specify the regime governing their property relations, as well as the properties involved.

If there is no adequate provision in a written agreement between the parties, the petitioner may apply for a provisional order for spousal support, custody and support of common children, visitation rights, administration of community or conjugal property, and other matters similarly requiring urgent action.

(3) It must be verified and accompanied by a certification against forum shopping. The verification and certification must be signed personally by the petitioner. No petition may be filed solely by counsel or through an attorney-in-fact.

If the petitioner is in a foreign country, the verification and certification against forum shopping shall be authenticated by the duly authorized officer of the Philippine embassy or legation, consul general, consul or vice-consul or consular agent in said country.

(4) It shall be filed in six copies. The petitioner shall serve a copy of the petition on the Office of the Solicitor General and the Office of the City or Provincial Prosecutor, within five days from the date of its filing and submit to the court proof of such service within the same period.

Failure to comply with any of the preceding requirements may be a ground for immediate dismissal of the petition.

Sec. 6. Summons.–The service of summons shall be governed by Rule 14 of the Rules of Court and by the following rules:


  1. Where the respondent cannot be located at his given address or his whereabouts are unknown and cannot be ascertained by diligent inquiry, service of summons may, by leave of court, be effected upon him by publication once a week for two consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the Philippines and in such places as the court may order. In addition, a copy of the summons shall be served on the respondent at his last known address by registered mail or any other means the court may deem sufficient.

  2. The summons to be published shall be contained in an order of the court with the following data: (a) title of the case; (b) docket number; (c) nature of the petition; (d) principal grounds of the petition and the reliefs prayed for; and (e) a directive for the respondent to answer within thirty days from the last issue of publication.


Sec. 7. Motion to dismiss.–No motion to dismiss the petition shall be allowed except on the ground of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter or over the parties; provided, however, that any other ground that might warrant a dismissal of the case may be raised as an affirmative defense in an answer.

Sec. 8. Answer.–(1) The respondent shall file his answer within fifteen days from service of summons, or within thirty days from the last issue of publication in case of service of summons by publication. The answer must be verified by the respondent himself and not by counsel or attorney-in-fact.

(2) If the respondent fails to file an answer, the court shall not declare him or her in default.

(3) Where no answer is filed or if the answer does not tender an issue, the court shall order the public prosecutor to investigate whether collusion exists between the parties.

Sec. 9. Investigation report of public prosecutor.–(1) Within one month after receipt of the court order mentioned in paragraph (3) of Section 8 above, the public prosecutor shall submit a report to the court stating whether the parties are in collusion and serve copies thereof on the parties and their respective counsels, if any.

(2) If the public prosecutor finds that collusion exists, he shall state the basis thereof in his report. The parties shall file their respective comments on the finding of collusion within ten days from receipt of a copy of the report. The court shall set the report for hearing and if convinced that the parties are in collusion, it shall dismiss the petition.

(3) If the public prosecutor reports that no collusion exists, the court shall set the case for pre-trial. It shall be the duty of the public prosecutor to appear for the State at the pre-trial.

Sec. 10. Social worker.–The court may require a social worker to conduct a case study and submit the corresponding report at least three days before the pre-trial. The court may also require a case study at any stage of the case whenever necessary.

Sec. 11. Pre-trial.– 

(1) Pre-trial mandatory.–A pre-trial is mandatory. On motion or motu proprio, the court shall set the pre-trial after the last pleading has been served and filed, or upon receipt of the report of the public prosecutor that no collusion exists between the parties.

(2) Notice of pre-trial.–(a) The notice of pre-trial shall contain:

(1) the date of pre-trial conference; and

(2) an order directing the parties to file and serve their respective pre-trial briefs in such manner as shall ensure the receipt thereof by the adverse party at least three days before the date of pre-trial.

(b) The notice shall be served separately on the parties and their respective counsels as well as on the public prosecutor. It shall be their duty to appear personally at the pre-trial.

(c) Notice of pre-trial shall be sent to the respondent even if he fails to file an answer. In case of summons by publication and the respondent failed to file his answer, notice of pre-trial shall be sent to respondent at his last known address.

Sec. 12. Contents of pre-trial brief.–The pre-trial brief shall contain the following:

(a) A statement of the willingness of the parties to enter into agreements as may be allowed by law, indicating the desired terms thereof;

(b) A concise statement of their respective claims together with the applicable laws and authorities;

(c) Admitted facts and proposed stipulations of facts, as well as the disputed factual and legal issues;

(d) All the evidence to be presented, including expert opinion, if any, briefly stating or describing the nature and purpose thereof;

(e) The number and names of the witnesses and their respective affidavits; and

(f) Such other matters as the court may require.


Failure to file the pre-trial brief or to comply with its required contents shall have the same effect as failure to appear at the pre-trial under the succeeding paragraphs.

Sec. 13. Effect of failure to appear at the pre-trial.–(a) If the petitioner fails to appear personally, the case shall be dismissed unless his counsel or a duly authorized representative appears in court and proves a valid excuse for the non-appearance of the petitioner.

(b) If the respondent has filed his answer but fails to appear, the court shall proceed with the pre-trial and require the public prosecutor to investigate the non-appearance of the respondent and submit within fifteen days thereafter a report to the court stating whether his non-appearance is due to any collusion between the parties. If there is no collusion, the court shall require the public prosecutor to intervene for the State during the trial on the merits to prevent suppression or fabrication of evidence.

Sec. 14. Pre-trial conference.–At the pre-trial conference, the court:

(a) May refer the issues to a mediator who shall assist the parties in reaching an agreement on matters not prohibited by law.

The mediator shall render a report within one month from referral which, for good reasons, the court may extend for a period not exceeding one month.

(b) In case mediation is not availed of or where it fails, the court shall proceed with the pre-trial conference, on which occasion it shall consider the advisability of receiving expert testimony and such other matters as may aid in the prompt disposition of the petition.

Sec. 15. Pre-trial order.–(a) The proceedings in the pre-trial shall be recorded. Upon termination of the pre-trial, the court shall issue a pre-trial order which shall recite in detail the matters taken up in the conference, the action taken thereon, the amendments allowed on the pleadings, and, except as to the ground of declaration of nullity or annulment, the agreements or admissions made by the parties on any of the matters considered, including any provisional order that may be necessary or agreed upon by the parties.

(b) Should the action proceed to trial, the order shall contain a recital of the following:


  1. Facts undisputed, admitted, and those which need not be proved subject to Section 16 of this Rule;

  2. Factual and legal issues to be litigated;

  3. Evidence, including objects and documents, that have been marked and will be presented;

  4. Names of witnesses who will be presented and their testimonies in the form of affidavits; and

  5. Schedule of the presentation of evidence.


(c) The pre-trial order shall also contain a directive to the public prosecutor to appear for the State and take steps to prevent collusion between the parties at any stage of the proceedings and fabrication or suppression of evidence during the trial on the merits.

(d) The parties shall not be allowed to raise issues or present witnesses and evidence other than those stated in the pre-trial order. The order shall control the trial of the case, unless modified by the court to prevent manifest injustice.

(e) The parties shall have five days from receipt of the pre-trial order to propose corrections or modifications.

Sec. 16. Prohibited compromise.–The court shall not allow compromise on prohibited matters, such as the following:

(a) The civil status of persons;

(b) The validity of a marriage or of a legal separation;

(c) Any ground for legal separation;

(d) Future support;

(e) The jurisdiction of courts; and

(f) Future legitime.


Sec. 17. Trial.–(1) The presiding judge shall personally conduct the trial of the case. No delegation of the reception of evidence to a commissioner shall be allowed except as to matters involving property relations of the spouses.

(2) The grounds for declaration of absolute nullity or annulment of marriage must be proved. No judgment on the pleadings, summary judgment, or confession of judgment shall be allowed.

(3) The court may order the exclusion from the courtroom of all persons, including members of the press, who do not have a direct interest in the case. Such an order may be made if the court determines on the record that requiring a party to testify in open court would not enhance the ascertainment of truth; would cause to the party psychological harm or inability to effectively communicate due to embarrassment, fear, or timidity; would violate the right of a party to privacy; or would be offensive to decency or public morals.

(4) No copy shall be taken nor any examination or perusal of the records of the case or parts thereof be made by any person other than a party or counsel of a party, except by order of the court.

Sec. 18. Memoranda.–The court may require the parties and the public prosecutor, in consultation with the Office of the Solicitor General, to file their respective memoranda in support of their claims within fifteen days from the date the trial is terminated. It may require the Office of the Solicitor General to file its own memorandum if the case is of significant interest to the State. No other pleadings or papers may be submitted without leave of court. After the lapse of the period herein provided, the case will be considered submitted for decision, with or without the memoranda.

Sec. 19. Decision.–(1) If the court renders a decision granting the petition, it shall declare therein that the decree of absolute nullity or decree of annulment shall be issued by the court only after compliance with Articles 50 and 51 of the Family Code as implemented under the Rule on Liquidation, Partition and Distribution of Properties.

(2) The parties, including the Solicitor General and the public prosecutor, shall be served with copies of the decision personally or by registered mail. If the respondent summoned by publication failed to appear in the action, the dispositive part of the decision shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation.

(3) The decision becomes final upon the expiration of fifteen days from notice to the parties. Entry of judgment shall be made if no motion for reconsideration or new trial, or appeal is filed by any of the parties, the public prosecutor, or the Solicitor General.

(4) Upon the finality of the decision, the court shall forthwith issue the corresponding decree if the parties have no properties.

If the parties have properties, the court shall observe the procedure prescribed in Section 21 of this Rule.

The entry of judgment shall be registered in the Civil Registry where the marriage was recorded and in the Civil Registry where the Family Court granting the petition for declaration of absolute nullity or annulment of marriage is located.

Sec. 20. Appeal.

(1) Pre-condition.–No appeal from the decision shall be allowed unless the appellant has filed a motion for reconsideration or new trial within fifteen days from notice of judgment.

(2) Notice of appeal.–An aggrieved party or the Solicitor General may appeal from the decision by filing a Notice of Appeal within fifteen days from notice of denial of the motion for reconsideration or new trial. The appellant shall serve a copy of the notice of appeal on the adverse parties.

Sec. 21. Liquidation, partition and distribution, custody, support of common children and delivery of their presumptive legitimes.–Upon entry of the judgment granting the petition, or, in case of appeal, upon receipt of the entry of judgment of the appellate court granting the petition, the Family Court, on motion of either party, shall proceed with the liquidation, partition and distribution of the properties of the spouses, including custody, support of common children and delivery of their presumptive legitimes pursuant to Articles 50 and 51 of the Family Code unless such matters had been adjudicated in previous judicial proceedings.

Sec. 22. Issuance of Decree of Declaration of Absolute Nullity or Annulment of Marriage.–(a) The court shall issue the Decree after:


  1. Registration of the entry of judgment granting the petition for declaration of nullity or annulment of marriage in the Civil Registry where the marriage was celebrated and in the Civil Registry of the place where the Family Court is located; 

  2. Registration of the approved partition and distribution of the properties of the spouses, in the proper Register of Deeds where the real properties are located; and

  3. The delivery of the children’s presumptive legitimes in cash, property, or sound securities.


(b) The court shall quote in the Decree the dispositive portion of the judgment entered and attach to the Decree the approved deed of partition.

Except in the case of children under Articles 36 and 53 of the Family Code, the court shall order the Local Civil Registrar to issue an amended birth certificate indicating the new civil status of the children affected.

Sec. 23. Registration and publication of the decree; decree as best evidence.–(a) The prevailing party shall cause the registration of the Decree in the Civil Registry where the marriage was registered, the Civil Registry of the place where the Family Court is situated, and in the National Census and Statistics Office. He shall report to the court compliance with this requirement within thirty days from receipt of the copy of the Decree.

(b) In case service of summons was made by publication, the parties shall cause the publication of the Decree once in a newspaper of general circulation.

(c) The registered Decree shall be the best evidence to prove the declaration of absolute nullity or annulment of marriage and shall serve as notice to third persons concerning the properties of petitioner and respondent as well as the properties or presumptive legitimes delivered to their common children.

Sec. 24. Effect of death of a party; duty of the Family Court or Appellate Court.–(a) In case a party dies at any stage of the proceedings before the entry of judgment, the court shall order the case closed and terminated, without prejudice to the settlement of the estate in proper proceedings in the regular courts.

(b) If the party dies after the entry of judgment of nullity or annulment, the judgment shall be binding upon the parties and their successors in interest in the settlement of the estate in the regular courts.

Sec. 25. Effectivity.–This Rule shall take effect on March 15, 2003 following its publication in a newspaper of general circulation not later than March 7, 2003.

EN BANC

A.M. No. 02-11-10-SC

RE: PROPOSED RULE ON DECLARATION OF ABSOLUTE

NULLITY OF VOID MARRIAGES AND ANNULMENT

OF VOIDABLE MARRIAGES

R E S O L U T I O N


Acting on the letter of the Chairman of the Committee on Revision of the Rules of Court submitting for this Court’s consideration and approval the Proposed Rule on Declaration of Absolute Nullity of Void Marriages and Annulment of Voidable Marriages, the Court Resolved to APPROVE the same.

The Rule shall take effect on March 15, 2003 following its publication in a newspaper of general circulation not later than March 7, 2003.

March 4, 2003.

Davide, Jr., C.J., Bellosillo, Puno, Mendoza, Quisumbing, Sandoval-Gutierrez, Carpio, Austria-Martinez, Carpio Morales, Callejo, Sr., and Azcuna, JJ., concur.

Vitug, J., it is my understanding that neither Santos nor Molina has been made irrelevant, let alone necessarily overturned by the new rules.

Panganiban, J., please see Dissenting Opinion on Rule relating to psychological incapacity.

Ynares-Santiago, J., on leave.

Corona, J., on official leave.